Nina Cresswell: Another feminist peddling false information about the Eleanor de Freitas case.

Here we go again. Another feminist jumping on the bandwagon. In the last few weeks Nina Cresswell has been making false statements on social media and in various news interviews, implying that Eleanor de Freitas was a victim of rape.

Yet again I had to write to these news publications, asking for corrections.

I have no idea who Nina Cresswell is, other than she recently won a court case regarding an allegation of rape, evolving someone she met on a night out. I know this, because she has been writing about her victory on the internet and doing a large number of press interviews.

Now, for some bizarre reason she is writing about my case, and making comparisons. Not only is she bringing up my case, she is making false statements about it.

Nina, if you're reading this post, please leave me alone. You have no idea about my case, you don't know me, you never met Eleanor, and by making false statements you are not assisting your own credibility.

The facts are, both the Attorney General and Director of Public Prosecutions have found that it was correct to prosecute Ms de Freitas and they spent a very long time going through all the evidence. 

The coroner, in High Court documents, also remarked that the motive of suicide could also have been caused or contributed by her problematic relationship with her parents, which was extensively documented in various medical records including a lengthy psychiatric report.

Nina Cresswell

Eleanor de Freitas: "I can be Machiavellian and plotting if I need to be"

Ten years on, various charities and activists continue to pump out the false narrative that Eleanor de Freitas was a "helpless victim", who was "vulnerable" and was "driven to her death" by the court processes. 

It is misleading, confuses the public, and implies wrongdoing by me. 

The facts are: Eleanor was a narcissist, who's mental health issues stemmed from her problematic relationship with her parents. She made false allegations as a form of revenge, when I rejected her (after I found out she was a prostitute).

The 2013 psychiatric report of Dr Rogers, which was referred to at the 2015 inquest, clearly backs up everything I say. 

Some extracts from the report:

Page 7:   "[I can be] Machiavellian and plotting if I need to be".

Page 8: She describes having regular suicidal feelings, which lead to "will writing" and "numerous expression of suicidal distress," and some of these occasions had represented "angry gestures towards her parents".

Page 13: Psychiatrist remarks: "In her themes of speech, there were occasions when she was self aggrandising.... I found her somewhat boastful, for example her intellect, achievements or general superiority. She described herself as a gifted child. She was somewhat dismissive of those she considered inferior to her".

EDF: "I can be Machiavellian and plotting if I need to be".